Broadband for Milton KeynesInterested in lobbying BT for Broadband access? Contact us! BT MeetingHere's my report from our meeting with BT, held on 14th November 2003 at Phoenix House. BT Attendees:John Small
Bradley Borum
Serena Shukla
Geoff Gauntlett
MK Broadband Action Group Attendees:David Hoskins
John Bint
Nick Hubbard
Report SummaryBradley Borum and John Small are genuinely keen to solve the Broadband
problems we have in Milton Keynes. Bradley is tasked with analysing the problem,
and it will be several weeks before she can present any business cases to John
Small. Meeting DetailsBradley has audited 29 of the 52 estates within the Bradwell Abbey telephone area. That is data has been collated but not yet analysed. An explanation of the local loop was given by Geoff. Cable Air Pressure diagrams have been used to acquire "E-side" cable data. The ADSL signal attenuation can be calculated from gauge of wire used and cable length. Business CaseThe "Top Ten" PCP's will be analysed. The most problematic Primary Connection Points will be identified. (These are the green cabinets within the estates set by the road side.) A business case for each one will be made. What is the cost for each length and gauge of replacement cable? Will underground ducts have to be installed if the cable is re-routed? An example was given: a short cabling run may cost around £12k. An excavation with new ducting could cost 4 times that. Initial observations:Loughton has long "D-side" runs, over 800 metres. 64% of PCP's are fed with 0.4 gauge where 0.5 was expected. Investigations with signal testing have highlighted cable degradation on some cable runs. CommentsNothing of the old "North Bucks Villages" telecoms infrastructure remains. There may have been a few 10 pair cables originally. The new (1970's) exchanges completely replaced the old. The planning rules for telephony 10dB loss at 1.6kHz, typically 5km line length. Monkston was recently cabled with 0.5mm gauge "E-side". Why can't new lower loss cable be run in?Lower loss cable is thicker. There may not be physical space free in the ducts. Pulling the old out and running in the new is not an option: it's too disruptive. Copper is expensive. Other Broadband technologiesBT are looking at trialling other broadband technologies. They extend the reach of at the expense of reduced speed. The technologies being evaluated are:
These trials will involve BT employees. John Small would like to see participation from Milton Keynes Broadband Action Group members too. (They may be reluctance from some parts of BT about this.) EvaluationJohn Small will evaluate all options. Specifically asked if re-cabling would be delayed, awaiting evaluation of technical trials. "No, if re-cabling can be justified, it will be carried out." Next MeetingOur next meeting will be held in February 2004. BT expect to give us a clearer update on how they intend to address households with over 60dB line loss. We also hope to have answers to this sort of question: why is the cable run from
Fishermead 3km to Monkston, 7km Middleton, 11km to Broughton? We would expect
3km to Monkston, 3.5km Middleton, 4.5km to Broughton. ConclusionsDave, John and I had a meeting post-mortem at MacDonald's. (Dave commented that with the soggy leaves and wet windy weather it was ideal for an interment.) We were disappointed that there was very little of substance to report. No dates, forecasts or plans to report back to the members. We were also gob-smacked that BT appear to know so little about their infrastructure.Although disappointed that there is no quick fix, we were encouraged that BT are genuinely keen to solve our Broadband problems. The Milton Keynes Broadband Action Group, with its 695 members, is making an impact within BT. SequelSerena phoned me after reading the above. The whole of BT were analysing their procedures and processes for dealing with public lobby groups such as ours. LinksFollow these links to read the previous BT meeting reports: Pre-meeting questions If you live in Milton Keynes, and want Broadband, let me know! |
|
|